🔗 Share this article

The nation's controversial action to prohibit social platforms access for individuals under sixteen is creating waves worldwide. Lawmakers, child protection groups, and families are monitoring closely to see if this tactic will inspire imitation for other nations.

The European Movement

Throughout Europe, a growing group of states are exploring comparable restrictions.

• Denmark has stated a ban on social media for youth below 15, with the prime minister stating that phones and apps are "taking away our children's youth". Legislation could be passed next year.
• Norway is preparing to implement a access barrier of 15, citing the need to safeguard young people from the "manipulative force of the algorithms".
• The Irish government is introducing a online verification tool to verify the user details of social media users. Authorities have suggested that an Australian-model ban remains "an measures under consideration".
• In The Spanish government, the prime minister has asked lawmakers to approve a law raising the minimum age for accessing social media to 16.
• In France, the leader has floated the idea of a ban for those under fifteen, and a government panel has recommended a similar move, potentially involving an overnight "screen time restriction" for older teenagers.
• The authorities in the Netherlands has advised guardians to prevent their children from social media until 15.

At the EU level, the European parliament has passed a non-binding motion demanding a ban for under-16s unless a parent decides otherwise is given. Even though it highlights of the "addictive" design of these services, the move does not enact mandatory rules.

"An effective age barrier is a useful foundation," said the European lawmaker driving the measure.

The UK: A Watchful Stance

Across Britain, the government has not ruled out a possible ban, arguing that "no measure is discarded" but maintaining any action must be "supported by conclusive research".

Earlier, momentum built behind a bill to enact restrictions on social media use by teenagers, but it was in the end watered down. Nonetheless, the administration committed to conduct more studies the issue.

Advocacy groups have raised apprehensions. One foundation set up by the loved ones of a young person who died after viewing dangerous online content contends that a blanket age ban might not protect children and could result in a "sudden drop-off" of risk when young people turn 16.

"Australia's ban is a response to the refusal of the Silicon Valley to build platforms and apps that are appropriate and fit for children," commented a prominent peer.

The United States: A State-by-State Landscape

In the United States, action is primarily occurring at the regional level due to national gridlock.

• The state of Utah demands adult approval for those under 18 to use social media and controls late-night use.
• Florida has enacted a measure banning children under fourteen from joining social media, though it is subject to constitutional disputes.
• Virginia has approved a regulation capping under-16s to a single hour of social media time per day, with additional time dependent on parental permission.
• The state of Georgia, Tennessee, and The state of Louisiana have similarly passed measures mandating parental consent for under-16s to create social media accounts.

Even with bipartisan support and calls from some figures to mimic Australia's path, a federal ban is right now seen as a distant prospect.

International Outlook

Outside of these regions, other countries are likewise considering moves.

• The Malaysian government intends to ban social media for those under sixteen starting from next year.
• Brazil has increased the minimum age for one major platform to 16.

But, international bodies take a more nuanced tone. A major UN agency has warned that social media bans pose dangers and "may even prove counterproductive". The organization points out that the internet can be a "critical link" for marginalized youth and that government action should not be a "replacement" for social media firms to prioritize user protection.

While this worldwide debate continues, the policies of this nation and its followers show that governments internationally are increasingly prepared to stand by for the industry to make changes on their own.