🔗 Share this article

It's Black History Month in the United Kingdom, and it appears it’s time for a rethink. As time has passed, an celebration that was initiated as a commemorative event of history, culture and the connections between international African diaspora communities, has developed a corporate feel, growing to encompass events where Black people are paid to talk to white audiences about hidden biases and “allyship”. The 2020s Black Lives Matter protests created a surge in the business of demonstrating racial awareness. But even that moment has passed. The surge has reached its height, producing a diluted aftermath of what increasing understanding is for.

The Background of Black History Celebration

First commemorated in the US and Canada, Black History Month was established in 1962 as an observance of African American heritage by African American historian Carter G. Woodson with seven days of celebration and reflection in the middle of February. Black History Month evolved from this campaign and was officially launched in 1970. Today it is observed not only in the North America in winter, but also in October in the United Kingdom, the Federal Republic of Germany, the Republic of Ireland and the Netherlands.

The observance has evolved since that time, giving reduced attention to the accounts of the slave trade across the Atlantic and civil rights battles, and greater focus on influential individuals of color in politics, culture, and activism, and broadly celebrating the impact Black people have made to shape the country. It is in learning environments where Black History Month is most commonly celebrated, with discussions and heritage festivities. But the way the celebration is commemorated is a manifestation of the current political situation. How it progresses is a instructive case in how appropriation leads to weakening: the restructuring of Black History Month has stymied the point of it, which is to tackle embedded and established prejudice.

---

A Troubling Time

Little demonstrates how important it is to reevaluate Black History Month more than the particular moment in which it falls this year. In the United Kingdom, a resurgent right in the guise of the Reform party is leading the polls. In the summer we observed the most significant ultra-conservative gathering in British history. a prominent political figure, the African descendant in charge of the right-wing political group, is a strong critic of anti-racism activism, and we are in a situation where a elected representative gains confidence to state that “not seeing any white faces” in certain urban areas is a reason for concern. Simultaneously, extreme conservative groups are expanding in Europe as a complete entity.

In the America, a significant offensive against diversity initiatives and positive discrimination has been carried, frequently with success, to the highest courts of the nation. A drive to remove the history of people of color and legacy from the historical documents is under way. One of the former president's initial presidential directives targeted the National Museum of African American History and Culture, and the Smithsonian Institution, accusing them of a “concerted and widespread effort to alter the country's historical narrative” by depicting the United States “as fundamentally prejudiced”.

Against this backdrop, the observance represents how little it can be effective if it is confined to either obligatory business commemorations, or politically neutered celebrations of contributions in the past, rather than challenging the conditions of the contemporary world. It also reveals how its restricted time span means that it is disconnected from the more extensive continuous action that is required. Denise Miller, a educator at an educational institution, articulated it most accurately when she expressed apprehension about the short-term symbolic gestures of the observance. “The difficulty with adopting a symbolic stance”, she stated, “is that it often means that Black History Month evolves into a fleeting performance rather than a catalyst for change.”

---

Rethinking, But Not Jettisoning

Determining how to adjust, modify and expand initiatives for equal rights and acknowledgment in such moments of dejection and worry is a difficult task. There is a inclination to just discontinue observances such as Black History Month completely, believing they are inadequate for current needs, or are relics of an time that has been ineffective.

However, regardless of the situation, Black History Month, and in fact the entire extended network and legacy of racial movements – local anti-racism groups, diversity equity and inclusion initiatives, and indeed, including corporate presentations – represent an framework that a significant effort has been dedicated to. It is there not just to decay as the situation evolves (and in fact, deteriorates), but to be a vital organism.

So what would a new dynamic Black History Month look like? Firstly, it would be more than a single focused period: something that is distributed through the year (as certain organizations are already starting to implement), elements of its material (particularly around prominent figures of color) incorporated into academic syllabi. It would also be a time that does not avoid political issues, and provides room for people, particularly youth, to express their concerns and stories. What use is simple recognition of the history when it fails to address the contemporary truth of ultra-nationalist gatherings in the street? Institutions who observe it should not be reassured with the passive language of implicit prejudice and sensitivity to “microaggressions”, but confronted with the risks that face all if anti-racism is not taken seriously. Briefly stated, Black History Month should be made current, urgent, and responsive. It could be that an entire name rebrand is required – Contemporary Black History Month.